By Subhash K. Jha, Indo-Asian News ServiceFilm: “Eklavya: The Royal Guard”; Cast: Amitabh Bachchan, Saif Ali Khan, Vidya Balan, Sharmila Tagore, Boman Irani, Jackie Shroff, Jimmy Shergil; Director: Vidhu Vinod Chopra; Rating: ** 1/2
Can form, no matter how glorious, be a substitute for content? In “Eklavya”, lack of content isn’t a problem. It’s the tense and dark nature of the content that proves to be a dismaying impediment to enjoying the virility of Vidhu Vinod Chopra’s storytelling.
How do we define the plot of “Eklavya”? It partly borrows the dark, indefinable pathos of Shakespeare’s tragedy and partly reverts to the palatial pathos of the Mughal Empire where patricide frequently collided with complex Oedipal equations. “Eklavya” takes us into a territory totally unexplored and designed to create an ethos of infinite resonances.
Some stories are better left unsaid. “Eklavya” tragically seems to belong to that rare genre of stories that lose their relevance in their rendering. The characters, all ruefully rooted to a decadent and dying aristocracy, are either neurotic, manic or self-destructive.
All the people who crowd the tightly cordoned stratosphere of “Eklavya” are grandly wedded to destructive forces. Unwittingly they end up looking preposterous in their self-conscious postures of assumed dignity.
In their inability to see beyond their own hefty hunger for self- assertion, the characters often mimic, rather than replicate, the Shakespearean tragedy.
Chopra is undoubtedly a master craftsman. At times he becomes self- indulgent in his visual panache. In the sequence where “Eklavya” slaughters Jimmy Shergil, the recurrent pigeons-leitmotif (seen earlier in “Parinda”) are classic Chopra embellishments best left behind in a film that in many ways crosses the boundaries of mainstream conventions.
Indeed, if Vishal Bhardwaj’s Omkara was more Ram Gopal Varma than Shakespeare, Eklavya is more Virginia Woolf than Shakespeare.
Chopra is brilliant at capturing neurosis through the lens of the camera. At times he makes room for tenderness. Watch Bachchan’s expression of tender nostalgia as Vidya Balan sings the ancestral lullaby.
You often see the characters framed frantically as wounded, scarred mortals hurtling towards their ruin – they do not connect with us in any significant way.
Reciting Shakespearean sonnets on death-beds, sobbing into the night, stabbing each other in their aristocratic backs, playing mind games that echo the travesties of titular existence, Chopra’s people come alive more through their externalities rather than his efforts to internalise their angst.
Chopra spares no efforts to penetrate the steely wily hearts of these bereft souls. Rajasthan is captured in telltale silhouettes as the stately royal guard Eklavya (Bachchan) forms a fertile bond with a family of doomed aristocrats.
The narration begins as a mother-son story and builds with magical volition into a father-son tale of clenched trauma. By the time Eklavya points a gun at his own heir-apparent, we are left looking at a family that doesn’t need redemption. It just needs to be buried in the slinky sand dunes of time.
The performances by Bachchan and Saif Ali Khan – the royal heir who finds out that the family guard is actually his father – lift the tale to luminous heights. Boman Irani, as the infertile royal patriarch, plays his character with just that shadowy hint of mischief that puts him a cut above the routine slime-ball.
“Eklavya” is a chronicle of defeat. People who belong to no specific time zone seem to be manoeuvring their lives beyond the rhythms of the rationale.
There’s poetry in the soul of the movie. But the lines do not represent any significant symbiosis of form and content. With its unforgettable images of elemental forces, “Eklavya” is a film that was probably as hard to make as it is to profile and define.
At the end, it remains an honourable failure, lifted to distinction by Bachchan’s stately performance.
BollywooodEntertainment.com.au Rating: 2
Write your own Review on the Movie, Comment Below !